Rheingold recounts how the development of communication technology has removed the power top transmit messages from a tiny elite, and had been a force for democratization. Following Benkler's idea of peer production he explains how the diffusion of many-to-many communication technologies enables new forms of collective action.
Play from beginning | |
00:00:00 | Interview with Howard Rheingold |
00:00:05 | Of course the most important change that the internet |
00:00:08 | brought has been a democratisation of the ability to create |
00:00:14 | and distribute not only your opinions, but all sorts of media. |
00:00:20 | It used to be that if you had a radio station or TV station or printing press |
00:00:27 | you could broadcast your views to a very large number of people |
00:00:31 | at quite a bit of expenseive and a fairly small percentage of the population was able do that. |
00:00:37 | The internet made it possible for everyone who had a personal computer |
00:00:42 | that was connected to the network to in effect have a printing press, |
00:00:47 | and a broadcasting station and a place of assembly a place where community |
00:00:53 | could take place, a market place. |
00:00:56 | That's a very radical change in the way the printing press was a radical change. |
00:01:02 | For thousands of years, scribal culture really hand-picked the people who were |
00:01:09 | given this code to transmit knowledge across time and space. |
00:01:14 | In the wake of the printing press, milions of people became literate |
00:01:19 | instead of thousands and constitutions, democracies, science |
00:01:24 | as collective knowledge gathering, the protestant reformation Ð very large scale social changes |
00:01:31 | Ð were enabled by a literate population. |
00:01:35 | So now we're seeing the beginning of vast expansion of literacy, |
00:01:41 | not only in the ability to send words on a page, but TV and audio |
00:01:50 | and software and music and movies from any spot to any other spot. |
00:01:58 | Structurally, that change is a very dramatic change |
00:02:04 | and socially it means that we now have another population |
00:02:08 | that has a degree of literacy that will enable them to organise forms of collective action |
00:02:15 | that they weren't able to organise before. |
00:02:17 | Just as you couldn't govern yourself, |
00:02:19 | you couldn't overthrow the monarchy and create a constitution |
00:02:23 | without a literate population. You couldn't create science as a collective enterprise, |
00:02:29 | you had to wait for Newton or a Gallileo or an Aristotle to come along, |
00:02:34 | you couldn't enlist entire populations of people in that. |
00:02:38 | So I think the largest social question is what forms of collective action - |
00:02:43 | and that could be political, rise of democracy and nation states, |
00:02:48 | it could be economic, the emergence of market capitalism in the wake of Gutenberg, |
00:02:55 | literacy Ð it's cultural: public education afforded by cheap printing. |
00:03:04 | Those are the kinds of changes that we ought to look at in the largest sense, |
00:03:10 | in regard to what the internet provides as a communication medium. |
00:03:15 | Well we're benefiting from two technological bonanzas |
00:03:21 | the microchip, Moore's law, making devices much more powerful and less expensive |
00:03:28 | every year, that means that a five year old's video game |
00:03:34 | has all the power that all the computers in the world had not too long ago. |
00:03:39 | That's a tremendous advantage in terms of putting the ability |
00:03:44 | to produce and distribute culture in the hands of many many people. |
00:03:49 | It used to be that you had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on a video camera, |
00:03:53 | You had to spend hundreds of dollars per hour to edit it, |
00:03:57 | now all those capabilities are broadly available. |
00:04:04 | But it's not only I think the distribution of news, media and cultural material |
00:04:11 | we're seeing with open source software production, the rise of peer production software |
00:04:19 | we're seeing with Wikipedia, the collective creation of knowledge or aggregation |
00:04:28 | of knowledge, what Yochai Benkler calls «commons based« peer production, |
00:04:34 | may well be a third method of economic production along with the market and the firm, |
00:04:40 | we're really in the earliest days of that, so I think the wide spread availability |
00:04:46 | of devices that enable people to compute and to capture and distribute media |
00:04:54 | we're only judging that on the basis of what we know from the past, |
00:04:59 | we really need to look forward to what entire populations of people are going to be able to |
00:05:04 | argue, are they going to be able to do scientific research? |
00:05:07 | Together we're now seeing with distributed computations, that people lend their computing |
00:05:12 | power to big scientific efforts to understand how proteins fold, |
00:05:16 | or the immune system works or the weather systems propagate. |
00:05:21 | Entirely new economic systems we have a very crude price system, |
00:05:27 | that allocates value according to what populations are willing to pay for commodities, |
00:05:34 | what if we were able to find out what individuals were willing to pay for commodities? |
00:05:40 | We're seeing subsistance farmers, who are able to get one bit of information on their mobile phones |
00:05:45 | should I walk 3 hours in this direction with my crop or 3 hours in that direction? |
00:05:51 | Or should I go to this port with my fish or that port with my fish? |
00:05:55 | That makes the difference between feeding their children and not feeding their children. |
00:05:59 | So I think we need to think broadly in terms of the kind of economic, political |
00:06:05 | and cultural power that can be wielded by populations. |
00:06:09 | formally that are only wielded by small numbers of people. |
00:06:16 | Centralised systems of communication that are expensive to operate |
00:06:23 | naturally support a centralised and hierachical power structure. |
00:06:29 | Those who can afford or those who have the weapons |
00:06:34 | to control a newspaper printing facility or a tv broadcasting system |
00:06:42 | have the power to inform and persuade; |
00:06:46 | that has proved to be a much more effective power |
00:06:50 | in many political instances than traditional weaponry. |
00:06:56 | When not just those who can afford to persuade and inform and perhaps misinform |
00:07:05 | have the ability to spread information we have a very different decentralised power regime |
00:07:11 | and certainly we are seeing a struggle between the incumbent powers that be |
00:07:18 | and people who suddently have cultural and political power they didn't have before. |
00:07:25 | I think if you belive in democracy having more people involved in decisions |
00:07:30 | about their govenance is a good thing, then in the long run this is a good thing. |
00:07:35 | But i think that democracy has its problems - the mob is as dangerous as the tyrant |
00:07:42 | and i would not put too much trust in the utopian decentralisation of power |
00:07:50 | without an accompanying kind of education about the use of that power. |
00:07:57 | The world in which our bodies exist does not cease to be important, |
00:08:02 | simply because we have this world of the mind. |
00:08:06 | A dictator or a criminal can come to your house and take you away, |
00:08:12 | or kill you. I think it's important to understand that physical power is not going away, |
00:08:20 | The rise of soft power means that physical power is not the only way |
00:08:26 | to sway populations, but I think we're going to see the co-existance |
00:08:32 | of hierarchies and networks of centralised power and decentralised power |
00:08:39 | of hard power and soft power, the ability of powerful and well financed players |
00:08:47 | to manipulate a distributed system should not be over looked. |