0
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,000
Interview with Rick Prelinger

1
00:00:05,372 --> 00:00:09,242
If you look at technology as a factor 

2
00:00:09,209 --> 00:00:14,047
in changing the way that we think about copyright 
and changing the way that the laws

3
00:00:14,314 --> 00:00:20,420
are made and experienced, it has an influence but  
surprisingly I'd think it has less of an influence

4
00:00:20,420 --> 00:00:21,654
than other people might think.

5
00:00:21,788 --> 00:00:26,459
I'm not much of a technological determinist, 
I think technology has put it on the agenda 

6
00:00:26,593 --> 00:00:31,831
But I think really what's going to be more significant, 
at least with an a capitalist society,

7
00:00:31,898 --> 00:00:37,303
is how these innovations effect the market 

8
00:00:37,470 --> 00:00:44,344
and then in a more sort of 
artistic and philosophical sense,

9
00:00:44,377 --> 00:00:50,050
what people are actually doing. 
So for example, you have people like Negativeland

10
00:00:50,050 --> 00:00:55,789
who've had an immense influence 
in terms of shifting the cultural perception of

11
00:00:56,022 --> 00:01:03,696
rights and wrongs, so to speak, 
but they've had absolutely no effect on the broad market per se

12
00:01:03,696 --> 00:01:06,733
they've removed a certain amount 
of pressure from artists.

13
00:01:06,966 --> 00:01:12,038
My sense of technology is that 
it opens up a whole new palette of possibilities

14
00:01:12,105 --> 00:01:18,978
But most of these possibilities 
don't ever have much effect in society

15
00:01:19,012 --> 00:01:24,918
Look at Bruce Sterling and the list 
of hundreds of thousands of dead media plattforms

16
00:01:25,051 --> 00:01:29,055
Much of what we're looking at today, 
as potentially revolutionary

17
00:01:29,089 --> 00:01:31,858
and emancipating, 
is going to end up dead media

18
00:01:31,891 --> 00:01:38,498
The bigger patterns, I remember when I was a voyager author 
and I was making CD-roms 

19
00:01:38,531 --> 00:01:44,737
you had all this serious discourse 
from artists and arts administrators with fancy haircuts 

20
00:01:44,838 --> 00:01:51,144
with a straight face talking about CD-ROM 
as a new artistic medium.

21
00:01:51,144 --> 00:01:59,452
Just like in UK they used to talk about tele-text
as a medium on to itself with it's own

22
00:01:59,452 --> 00:02:04,791
way of massaging the content that it carried, and yes that's true,

23
00:02:04,824 --> 00:02:09,929
but I think it's more that technology 
opens up a vision of possibilities 

24
00:02:09,929 --> 00:02:14,901
but people tend to be very, 
very choosy about what they pull off that menu.

25
00:02:16,369 --> 00:02:19,572
I will say with regard that technological determinism
 that it exists

26
00:02:19,539 --> 00:02:22,976
and we can't argue that the telephone changed the world,

27
00:02:22,976 --> 00:02:26,779
we can't argue that the internet changed the world. 
I frankly think that the telephone

28
00:02:26,813 --> 00:02:31,217
still casts a larger shadow on the world 
than the internet has to this point,

29
00:02:31,217 --> 00:02:38,892
 although internet's rapidly catching up, 
but these are very, very long cycles.

30
00:02:38,892 --> 00:02:44,330
So I don't know what file-sharing tells us yet 
about the cultural economy.

31
00:02:44,464 --> 00:02:48,234
I don't know what rip-mix-burn and 
all the things you that you can extrapolate

32
00:02:48,268 --> 00:02:53,406
from that very simple menu of actions
 tells us about the way

33
00:02:53,406 --> 00:02:57,377
that people are going to be 
expressing themselves in 2020, 2030.

34
00:02:57,377 --> 00:03:01,014
It could be that we have another generation 
of people that just watch

35
00:03:01,014 --> 00:03:06,252
movies and sit on their couch, 
except that there're fancier more immersive movies.

36
00:03:06,252 --> 00:03:07,320
We don't know yet. 

37
00:03:08,788 --> 00:03:16,963
What I think we need to do is be a little bit more provisional 
about the kind of regimes we set up,

38
00:03:17,063 --> 00:03:22,769
in other words that we don't build 
digital right management that lasts for decades.

39
00:03:22,769 --> 00:03:29,175
that we don't set rules for emerging technology 
that tends to cut off its potential

40
00:03:29,175 --> 00:03:33,413
from the very beginning, or 
if these rules exist that we don't accept them. 

41
00:03:38,151 --> 00:03:42,488
So with regard to copyright the first thing 
I'd say that there's been a number of historical periods

42
00:03:42,488 --> 00:03:44,457
where copyright gets foregrounded.

43
00:03:44,657 --> 00:03:49,262
You can talk about the french revolution 
and periods of time when

44
00:03:49,229 --> 00:03:55,969
copyright is used to enforce social ends 
and social control but in my lifetime

45
00:03:56,302 --> 00:04:02,141
copyright become a big topic of conversation 
in the 70s when we revised 

46
00:04:02,141 --> 00:04:04,210
the copyright act in the United States.

47
00:04:04,177 --> 00:04:07,647
That's when you suddenly started seeing 
copyright notices all over the place.

48
00:04:07,647 --> 00:04:12,785
In recent years there's been
 a few catalysts for a kind of a

49
00:04:12,819 --> 00:04:16,222
hugely increased consciousness 
of what copyright is all about. 

50
00:04:16,222 --> 00:04:24,097
The Eldred case - where Eric Eldred sued 
to overturn `Term Extension in the United States

51
00:04:24,097 --> 00:04:24,964
- and lost.

52
00:04:24,964 --> 00:04:28,901
 A lot of people got the sense that copyright 
was an issue to be concerned about.

53
00:04:28,901 --> 00:04:34,507
File-sharing and the prosecution of little kids
 and grandparents and ordinary people.

54
00:04:35,375 --> 00:04:41,014
- big issue. 
DRM is going to foreground copyright as a consumer issue

55
00:04:41,014 --> 00:04:42,548
I think that's already started.

56
00:04:42,815 --> 00:04:46,352
I think people are far too concerned about copyright actually

57
00:04:46,419 --> 00:04:52,859
I think we need to be aware of it and 
I think we shouldn't be passive, but on the other hand

58
00:04:52,892 --> 00:04:58,898
the problem is that we're all thinking about copyright 
to the point that it paralyses us.

59
00:04:59,065 --> 00:05:03,603
Copyright used to be the province of lawyers, maybe a few geeks,

60
00:05:03,770 --> 00:05:08,775
and in many, many ways I'd like to see us 
a little less concerned about copyright 

61
00:05:08,775 --> 00:05:12,211
and a little more concerned about culture and access. 

62
00:05:14,013 --> 00:05:19,952
Most of the decisions about the copyright regime 
under which we're going to live

63
00:05:20,053 --> 00:05:25,091
have already been made by large copyright holders 
by the culture industry.

64
00:05:25,224 --> 00:05:32,231
And it's their turf, we can't really play effectively 
on their turf, we have to be reactive.

65
00:05:32,465 --> 00:05:38,204
And this is no way to run a culture, 
we can not continue to react to other peoples rules.

66
00:05:38,204 --> 00:05:43,910
It leaves us no latitude to lay out 
what kind of a world we'd like to live in.

67
00:05:44,077 --> 00:05:46,279
I think we need to have a broad conversation

68
00:05:46,412 --> 00:05:50,183
that's probably going to be an international conversation 
where people who make things

69
00:05:50,216 --> 00:05:55,188
and people who use things, 
I'm talking about cultural works, sit together

70
00:05:55,221 --> 00:06:01,094
and think about what kinds of rules
 best serve these interests.

71
00:06:01,127 --> 00:06:08,134
I don't know that we're going to agree, 
but I think we need to ask a little bit more about utopia.

72
00:06:08,134 --> 00:06:13,873
We need to really figure out 
what kind of a world we'd like to live in,

73
00:06:13,906 --> 00:06:19,245
and then try to craft regulations to match that.  
Being reactive doesn't cut it.

74
00:06:19,412 --> 00:06:22,215
The big problem isn't going to be the copyright law,

75
00:06:22,215 --> 00:06:27,920
for most people that make culture 
it's going to be access to the original work.

76
00:06:28,054 --> 00:06:31,023
If you are trying to do something about music,

77
00:06:31,057 --> 00:06:33,960
how do you get access to the performance that you need?

78
00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:38,564
 If you're doing a historical piece 
on the civil rights movement in the United States

79
00:06:38,731 --> 00:06:42,702
how do you get access to stuff that's in the archive 
that hasn't already been aired?

80
00:06:42,702 --> 00:06:47,573
That's going to be the issue. 
Copyright in many cases is going to be the secondary issue.

81
00:06:47,607 --> 00:06:53,613
I think that a lot of the conflict, 
the so called copyright wars,

82
00:06:53,746 --> 00:06:57,583
have resulted from these 
poorly articulated business models.

83
00:06:57,650 --> 00:07:01,854
The publishing industries have been freaked out, 
recording industries have been freaked out,

84
00:07:02,021 --> 00:07:04,056
the movie industry has been freaked out.

85
00:07:04,023 --> 00:07:08,261
The suits don't know how to think about this 
but there's a generational shift - 

86
00:07:08,327 --> 00:07:15,802
there's a notion that 
some of these newer ways of marketing and exchanging

87
00:07:15,935 --> 00:07:20,540
cultural objects actually turn out 
to be more profitable for their owners.

88
00:07:20,740 --> 00:07:27,213
 I think the kind of extremism is starting 
to fade a way a little bit,

89
00:07:27,213 --> 00:07:29,549
and we have to think about 
what's a little more sustainable.

90
00:07:29,715 --> 00:07:33,152
I think we need to figure out 
what the rules should be ourselves,

91
00:07:33,219 --> 00:07:39,492
we can't let the Hollywood or 
lawyers of the US government figure it out for us.

92
00:07:39,625 --> 00:07:41,327
We should do it ourselves.

93
00:07:44,464 --> 00:07:48,568
A lot of people valorize the sixties
and in the sixties there was hardly any independent media.

94
00:07:48,568 --> 00:07:54,040
There were three television networks in the United States 
you had the BBC and the ITV.

95
00:07:54,040 --> 00:08:00,980
There was hardly any underground press, 
there was of course no blogs, no websites,

96
00:08:00,980 --> 00:08:06,419
a few obscure zines mostly in the literary 
and the political world that nobody saw.

97
00:08:06,586 --> 00:08:11,090
This is a rich and existing time 
to be alive and it's precisely because of

98
00:08:11,090 --> 00:08:15,795
cultural proliferation and the absence of rules, 
the absence of permission.

99
00:08:15,828 --> 00:08:17,864
I don't think that's going to go away.

100
00:08:19,165 --> 00:08:25,905
Even if it's a million black boards scratched with a rock, 
when the electricity goes off,

101
00:08:25,905 --> 00:08:27,540
I don't think that's going to go away. 

